“People-smugglers’ business-model” – Watch for concern-trolls. #OnWaterGate

[Update: the occasion for running this article were allegations that the LNP Government had paid people-smugglers to turn boats around, in effect outbidding those on vessels and forcing them back. The subsequent campaign by the ALP (and people who may not have known better) to present this as an activity exclusive to the LNP has just come apart, with revelations that the practice has been going on for around four years, during the terms of both Labor and LNP governments. See here. So, to repeat the point: we do not support the LNP-ALP contest over who is “tougher” on “people-smugglers,” but we are disappointed by many of those who were swept up in the ALP’s attempt to score political points by claiming they are better at “smashing the people-smugglers’ business model.” We call bullshit on this rank piece of propaganda.)

The phrase “people-smugglers’ business-model” is an exercise in concern-trolling.

Firstly, the phrase was invented in Australia at a time when successive governments were engaged in transferring increasing amounts of money to the (wholly privatised) mandatory detention industry and the Navy’s patrol and interdiction of unauthorised boat arrivals. Transfield and Serco are the largest corporations involved in both, including various multi-million dollar contracts with Defense. One of the first mentions in official statements was Rudd‘s remark during a radio interview in 2009: “People smugglers are engaged in the world’s most evil trade and they should all rot in jail, because they represent the absolute scum of the earth.” The phrase was an invention of Labor Governments, just as mandatory detention was introduced by a Labor Government some twenty years ago. In the last ten years, the expenditure on detention and repulsion has exceeded $10 billion – a figure that completely overshadows the amounts paid by people to those who own fishing vessels.

wadsofcash_TSE

Secondly, anti-“people-smuggling” campaigns are exercises in concern-trolling. They manipulate genuine concerns for those who are exploited into practical support for measures that are directed against those same people. There is no way to distinguish between those who steer the boats and those who travel on them, but the sleight of hand is important because it transfers the explicitly racist demonisation of asylum seekers to “people-smugglers,” and politicians can pretend they’re not whipping up a racist frenzy, while in practice the consequences are much the same. Moreover, the focus on “people-smugglers” echoes the language of conservative campaigns against “sex-trafficking” and “slave-trafficking” undertaken by (often Christian conservative) NGOs in Europe – hence its being taken up by Rudd. In Europe, there is also a strong critique of this position, often called the White Saviour Industrial Complex. The focus on “anti-trafficking” enables a sleight-of-hand through which campaigns against sexworkers, and migrant sexworkers in particular are re-spun as campaigns against those who “traffick,” and measures that are directed against migrant (sex) workers are repackaged as if they are ‘for their own good.’ The point is not that there aren’t traffickers who profit from desperation, the point is that the rhetoric of anti-trafficking campaigns often serves to obscure the fact that it is the migrant (sex) workers who suffer most as a result of those campaigns (not least by being deported, forced to go into hiding, or worse). Anti-trafficking campaigns do not make distinctions between people who voluntarily pay people-smugglers to take them somewhere, and traffickers who force them to go somewhere. That difference should be the one that really matters.

Thirdly, “people-smuggling” is a creation of prohibition. If there were safe and legal routes, people would take them. The effective criminalisation of people movements creates people-smuggling. There’s only one sure way to “smash the people-smuggling business model,” if that is indeed the objective: open the borders. Anything short of this in reality can only ever be a debate about who’ll be paid and how much to stop people from moving: Transfield, Serco, the Navy, NGOs, people who own some unsafe fishing boats?

Advertisements
“People-smugglers’ business-model” – Watch for concern-trolls. #OnWaterGate

Petition the UK Government to Embargo Sale/Lease of Vessels Used in #OSB Tow-Backs

The petition can be found here.

This is the text of the petition:  Continue reading “Petition the UK Government to Embargo Sale/Lease of Vessels Used in #OSB Tow-Backs”

Petition the UK Government to Embargo Sale/Lease of Vessels Used in #OSB Tow-Backs

Mapping the deterrence supply chain: The Afghanistan storyboard.

The PDF properties for the Afghanistan storyboard show Renee Le Cussan as the author.

Screen Shot 2014-02-12 at 8.36.07 AM

The document properties also indicate that the PDF was last modified on 10 September 2013. Given that the federal election took place on 7 September 2013 it is almost certain that the storyboard was commissioned by the previous – Labor – government.

LinkedIn shows a person by the name of Renee Le Cussan as the Director of the Neutrino Program at STATT Consulting.

Screen Shot 2014-02-12 at 8.36.52 AM

STATT Consulting, a Hong Kong based firm, “designs and implements responses to challenges that cross borders and link communities,” according to their website. They list Australian government agencies among their clients.

Screen Shot 2014-02-12 at 8.27.06 AM

The Neutrino Program “facilitat[es] two-way communications between migrant source communities and destination societies.” I guess that’s one way of putting it.

STATT have a current contract with the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service for “Education and Training Services,” which covers the relevant time (the contract period being 1 February 2013 – 30 June 2014). This contract is valued at over $2 million.

Screen Shot 2014-02-12 at 8.38.14 AM

Did STATT profit from this? Screen Shot 2014-02-11 at 5.35.59 PM

contact@statt.net

Mapping the deterrence supply chain: The Afghanistan storyboard.

Who Made this Graphic Novel to deter Afghan Asylum Seekers?

Image

The Guardian reports that, accompanying the ‘No Way. They will not make Australia home’ campaign, the government  published an 18 page graphic novel, titled ‘A Story Board on People Smuggling’, aimed at deterring asylum seekers arriving by boat. The story board was first published on the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service website in November.

Who made this?

Who Made this Graphic Novel to deter Afghan Asylum Seekers?

“He’s not even Australian.”

Responding to the reiteration, in detail, of claims that Australian officials deliberately burned asylum seekers’ hands during an ‘on water’ operation, Senator David Johnston urged the public not to trust the witness, Mr Fasher. The Australian reports:

Senator Johnson [sic] dismissed a report published by Fairfax Media yesterday in which Somalian man Yousif Ibrahim Fasher said he was a witness to brutality, where asylum-seekers allegedly had their hands deliberately burned.

“He’s not even Australian,” Senator Johnson [sic] said. “I mean, it’s all very well, but these people are desperate people, we are winning this battle, and I expect there will be more aspersions cast as they lose money, lose face and lose opportunity.”

Who do you believe?

Defence Minister Senator David Johnston

Sen Johnstone (Photo: Alex Ellinghausen)

Translator Yousif Ibrahim Fasher, right, claims  three asylum seekers had their hands deliberately burned by the Australian navy during its second operation to tow back an asylum vessel to Indonesia in January.

Yousif Ibrahim Fasher, right (Photo: Michael Bachelard)

Photo

“He’s not even Australian.”